United States v. Gerardo Nolasco-Martinez

653 F. App'x 871
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 2016
Docket15-30236
StatusUnpublished

This text of 653 F. App'x 871 (United States v. Gerardo Nolasco-Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gerardo Nolasco-Martinez, 653 F. App'x 871 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gerardo Nolasco-Martinez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We dismiss but remand to the district court to correct the judgment.

Nolasco-Martinez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. Because Nolasco-Martinez has been released from custody and is not subject to a term of supervised release, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the reference to section 1326(b)(1).

DISMISSED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Joseph M. Palomba
182 F.3d 1121 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Pablo Rivera-Sanchez
222 F.3d 1057 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
653 F. App'x 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gerardo-nolasco-martinez-ca9-2016.