United States v. Gerald Miner
This text of United States v. Gerald Miner (United States v. Gerald Miner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________
No. 98-2404EM _____________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Gerald Miner, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _____________
Submitted: January 18, 1999 Filed: January 28, 1999 _____________
Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Gerald Miner appeals the district court's denial of Miner's motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Miner's motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See United States v. Turk, 21 F.3d 309, 312 (8th Cir. 1994); United States v. LaFuente, 991 F.2d 1406, 1409 (8th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gerald Miner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gerald-miner-ca8-1999.