United States v. George Thomas Callahan

438 F.2d 528
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 5, 1971·No. 26931_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The trial judge did not give an instruction on viewing with caution the testimony of an accomplice. There was no request for such an instruction. There was no objection over the failure to give the instruction. Earlier the trial judge had indicated that he would give such an instruction. Under all the circumstances here, we find no plain error. There was a good general instruction on credibility of witnesses.

There is a point made that there was in fact no actual plea of “not guilty”. Trial counsel was aware of the oversight and did nothing. No real suggestion of prejudice is made.

Other points listed by appellant we find without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. George Thomas Callahan, 438 F.2d 528 (9th Cir. 1971).

438 F.2d 528 (United States v. George Thomas Callahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Charles Leon Davis
439 F.2d 1105 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)