United States v. George Ruelas
This text of 529 F. App'x 857 (United States v. George Ruelas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Federal prisoner George Michael Ruelas appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for production of photographic trial exhibits. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Ruelas contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for photographic evidence. The district court properly treated this motion as a discovery request because Ruelas requested the dis *858 covery in the ongoing review of his conviction. Because discovery orders are not final appealable orders, see United States v. Zone, 403 F.3d 1101, 1106 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam), we dismiss.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
529 F. App'x 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-george-ruelas-ca9-2013.