United States v. George Pena

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 11, 2018·No. 17-13833·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 17-13833 Date Filed: 06/11/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-13833

Non-Argument Calendar

D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cr-00161-MMH-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE PENA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

(June 11, 2018)

Before TJOFLAT, NEWSOM and ANDERSON Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced

Case: 17-13833 Date Filed: 06/11/2018 Page: 2 of 2

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error); United States v. Buchanan, 131 F.3d 1005, 1008 (11th Cir. 1997) (stating that motions to dismiss based on sentence appeal waivers should be decided at the earliest stage, except in extraordinary circumstances, to avoid depriving the government of the benefit that it has bargained for).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. George Pena, (11th Cir. 2018).

United States v. George Pena (United States v. George Pena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mauricio Grinard-Henry
399 F.3d 1294 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Bennie Bascomb, Jr.
451 F.3d 1292 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)