United States v. George Moran

470 F.2d 742, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11078
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided February 25, 1972·No. 71-1113·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s position, in a nutshell, on this appeal is that a jury could not find that he was “in possession [of a] counterfeited . •. obligation ... of the United States” (18 U.S.C. § 472) because the $10.00 notes, complete in every other respect, had been printed, and still remained, in sheets of six. We may agree that if the paper was unfinished in any significant particular, it was not yet a counterfeit. The jury was warranted in finding, however, that a snip with a pair of shears was too inconsequential a matter to consider significant. The paper was as readily available as it would have been had it been cut, and then tied in a package. Defendant’s point that any purchaser of the uncut sheets would have necessarily known they were not genuine is irrelevant. An illegal sale does not require the purchaser to be duped. 18 U.S.C. § 473.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. George Moran, 470 F.2d 742, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11078 (1st Cir. 1972).

470 F.2d 742 (United States v. George Moran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Nazira A. Gomes
969 F.2d 1290 (First Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Jose Moreno-Pulido
695 F.2d 1141 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack Smith
532 F.2d 1218 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
George Moran v. Marvin Hogan
494 F.2d 1220 (First Circuit, 1974)
United States v. John Joseph Chodor
479 F.2d 661 (First Circuit, 1973)