United States v. George Kenneth Fox

437 F.2d 419
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 22, 1971·No. 25917·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue on this appeal from appellant’s conviction for refusing induction into the armed services in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462 is whether or not his local Board’s order to report for induction was invalid because two of the five Board members resided outside the area of the Board’s jurisdiction when the appellant was classified I-A.

This court has held that portion of 32 C.F.R. § 1604.52(c), since rescinded, stating the residence qualifications on which appellant relies, is directory, not mandatory. United States v. Thaxter (9th Cir. 1971) 437 F.2d 417; United States v. Berger (9th Cir. 1970) 434 F.2d 610; United States v. Wallace (9th Cir. 1970) 435 F.2d 12; United States v. Reeb (9th Cir. 1970) 433 F.2d 381.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. George Kenneth Fox, 437 F.2d 419 (9th Cir. 1971).

437 F.2d 419 (United States v. George Kenneth Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Robert Edward Reeb
433 F.2d 381 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Asa John Berger
434 F.2d 610 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Alfred Loren Wallace
435 F.2d 12 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Paul Norman Thaxter
437 F.2d 417 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)