United States v. George Harper
This text of 22 F. App'x 681 (United States v. George Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The district court 1 dismissed as time-barred George Harper’s initial 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, which sought retroactive application of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We subsequently determined that *682 Apprendi may not be applied retroactively to initial § 2255 motions. United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001); see also Murphy v. United States, 268 F.3d 599, 601 (8th Cir.2001) (applying Moss); Jarrett v. United States, 266 F.3d 789, 791 (8th Cir.2001) (same).
Our decision in Moss is fatal to Harper’s Apprendi claim. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of Harper’s § 2255 motion.
. The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-george-harper-ca8-2001.