United States v. George Haber

Third Circuit

United States v. George Haber

192 F.2d 575

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedNovember 28, 1951

Docket10517

StatusPublished

This text of 192 F.2d 575 (United States v. George Haber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. George Haber, 192 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The arguments advanced by the appellant in his brief and on oral argument have had our careful consideration. We are satisfied, however, from our examination of the record that the district court did not err in admitting into evidence the physical exhibits and other evidence objected to by the appellant, that the evidence amply supported the verdict of guilty and that the trial judge did not err in his charge to the jury or in refusing certain of appellant’s requests for charge. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The arguments advanced by the appellant in his brief and on oral argument have had our careful consideration. We are satisfied, however, from our examination of the record that the district court did not err in admitting into evidence the physical exhibits and other evidence objected to by the appellant, that the evidence amply supported the verdict of guilty and that the trial judge did not err in his charge to the jury or in refusing certain of appellant’s requests for charge. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 F.2d 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-george-haber-ca3-1951.