United States v. George

Fourth Circuit

United States v. George

65 F. App'x 494

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2003·No. No. 03-6408·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Cyrus Jonathan George appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion to alter or amend his sentence. We have independently reviewed the record and find no [495] reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. George, No. CR-90-78 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Cyrus Jonathan George appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion to alter or amend his sentence. We have independently reviewed the record and find no [495] reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. George, No. CR-90-78 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. George, 65 F. App'x 494 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

65 F. App'x 494 (United States v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related