United States v. George
This text of United States v. George (United States v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6408
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CYRUS JONATHAN GEORGE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-78)
Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cyrus Jonathan George, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Edward Johnston, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Cyrus Jonathan George appeals the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part his motion to alter or amend
his sentence. We have independently reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. George, No. CR-90-78
(N.D.W. Va. Feb. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. George, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-george-ca4-2003.