United States v. George

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 2003
Docket03-6408
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. George (United States v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. George, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6408

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CYRUS JONATHAN GEORGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-78)

Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cyrus Jonathan George, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Edward Johnston, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Cyrus Jonathan George appeals the district court’s order

granting in part and denying in part his motion to alter or amend

his sentence. We have independently reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. George, No. CR-90-78

(N.D.W. Va. Feb. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. George, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-george-ca4-2003.