United States v. George

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 23, 1998
Docket98-6148
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. George (United States v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. George, (4th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6148

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CYRUS JONATHAN GEORGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-78)

Submitted: April 28, 1998 Decided: June 23, 1998

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cyrus Jonathan George, Appellant Pro Se. William David Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s orders denying his

petition for a writ of audita querela and denying his motion to

suspend judgment. See United States v. George, No. CR-90-78 (N.D.W.

Va. Jan. 13 & 20, 1998). A writ of audita querela is available

where there is a legal objection to a conviction that cannot be ad-

dressed pursuant to other post conviction remedies. See United

States v. Holder, 936 F.2d 1, 2-5 (1st Cir. 1991). Because Appel-

lant’s claims can be addressed under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A),

2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), we find that the district court did

not err in denying Appellant’s requested relief. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ewart Mark Holder
936 F.2d 1 (First Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. George, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-george-ca4-1998.