United States v. George

448 F.3d 96

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. George. Read the opinion of the Court — 448 F.3d 96 →

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided June 16, 2006·No. 05-1506·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 05-1506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

DANIEL H. GEORGE, JR.,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on May 24, 2006 is corrected as follows:

On page 2, second paragraph, delete "We present the facts in the light most favorable to the verdict. See United States v. Medina-Martinez, 396 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2005)."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 05-1506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

DANIEL H. GEORGE, JR.,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on May 24, 2006 is corrected as follows:

On page 2, second paragraph, delete "We present the facts in the light most favorable to the verdict. See United States v. Medina-Martinez, 396 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2005)."

United States v. George, 448 F.3d 96 (1st Cir. 2006).

Pincite

448 F.3d 96 (United States v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States v. Medina-Martinez

396 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2005)

Opinion

Related