United States v. Gaytan

95 F. App'x 554
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2004
Docket03-41166
StatusUnpublished

This text of 95 F. App'x 554 (United States v. Gaytan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gaytan, 95 F. App'x 554 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Gilbert Gaytan appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for importation of cocaine, a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960. The district court sentenced Gaytan to 120 months in prison, the statutory mandatory minimum term, and five years of supervised release.

Gaytan contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying his second motion for a continuance of his sentencing hearing. Except for summarily asserting that he needed more time to “allow [him] an opportunity to mitigate his sentence,” Gaytan has cited no legal or factual basis upon which a departure or reduction below the mandatory minimum might have been warranted. Because he has not established prejudice, he has not demonstrated that the district court erred in denying him a continuance. See United States v. Peden, 891 F.2d 514, 518 (5th Cir.1989).

The conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. John Pershing Peden, Jr.
891 F.2d 514 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 F. App'x 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gaytan-ca5-2004.