United States v. Gayle

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gayle

473 F. App'x 234

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 10, 2012

DocketNo. 12-6097

StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 234 (United States v. Gayle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Gayle, 473 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Enrique Alfonso Gayle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of clerical error in the criminal judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gayle, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-2 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 19, 2011; entered Dec. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Enrique Alfonso Gayle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of clerical error in the criminal judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gayle, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-2 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 19, 2011; entered Dec. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 F. App'x 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gayle-ca4-2012.