United States v. Gatling
This text of United States v. Gatling (United States v. Gatling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
marked with a bright line." United States v. Devaugh, 422 F. Supp. 3d 104, 114 (D.D.C.
2019) (quoting Hall v. District of Columbia, 867 F.3d 138, 153 (D.C. Cir. 2017)). Rather,
the "scope of the intrusion permitted will vary to some extent with the particular facts and
circumstances of each case." Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 500 (1983). Courts consider
objective and subjective factors, including "the officer's intent in stopping the citizen; the
impression conveyed to the citizen as to whether he was in custody or only briefly detained
for questioning; the length of the stop; the questions, if any, asked; and the extent of the
search, if any, made." See United States v. White, 648 F.2d 29, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
The Terry stop at issue here did not become an arrest until after Officer Mekhael
found the handgun in Gatling's satchel. Fewer than five minutes elapsed between Gatling's
first interaction with Officer Mekhael and the search of the satchel. See Mekhael BWC at
09:11:40-09:16:00. Cf United States v. Hutchinson, 408 F.3d 796, 801-02 (D.C. Cir.
2005) (prolonging Terry stop two to five minutes to run records check did not violate
Fourth Amendment). The stop lasted this long in part because Gatling "refus[ed] to comply
with .. . the pat down" and "actively resisted handcuffs" by "twisting his body." See
Hearing Tr. at 30:5-6, 32:21-25 (Officer Mekhael: "[I]t took a minute to actually secure
him in handcuffs."). Officer Mekhael also told Gatling he was being stopped for
investigation, not that he was being arrested, and he did not ask probing questions about
Gatling's conduct. Mekhael BWC at 09:13:00-09:13:25. These facts all suggest that
during the relevant time period, the stop remained a stop. See White, 648 F .3d at 34.
Gatling maintains that by pinning him against the small fence surrounding the stoop
and using handcuffs, the officers transformed the Terry stop into an arrest. Def.'s Mot. 8
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gatling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gatling-dcd-2025.