United States v. GASPAR

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedJune 4, 2024
Docket202400033
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. GASPAR (United States v. GASPAR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. GASPAR, (N.M. 2024).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before KISOR, BROWN, and MIZER Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Sherwin C. GASPAR Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202400033

Decided: 4 June 2024

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Eric A. Catto

Sentence adjudged 1 December 2023 by a special court-martial con- vened at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, consisting of a military judge sit- ting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, con- finement for two months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: Major Timothy G. McCormick, USMCR United States v. Gaspar, NMCCA No. 202400033 Opinion of the Court

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 However, we note the Entry of Judgment does not correctly identify Charge II to which Appellant pleaded guilty. 2 Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the content of his proceeding. 3 In accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1111(c)(2), we modify the Entry of Judgment and direct that it be included in the record. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

2 See Block 11 of the Entry of Judgment (incorrectly indicating that Charge II,

Violation of Article 121a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, corresponds to 10 U.S.C. § 921 rather than 10 U.S.C. § 921a). We appreciate Appellate Defense Counsel’s atten- tion to detail in identifying this matter. 3 United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).

2 This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 202400033

v. ENTRY OF Sherwin C. GASPAR JUDGMENT Sergeant (E-5) U.S. Marine Corps As Modified on Appeal Accused 4 June 2024

On 1 December 2023, the Accused was tried at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, by a special court-martial, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Military Judge Eric A. Catto presided.

FINDINGS

The following are the Accused’s pleas and the Court’s findings to all offenses the convening authority referred to trial:

Charge I: Violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 880. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.

Specification: On or about 29 March 2023, attempted fraudulent use of a credit card to obtain property of an aggregate value of more than $1000. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.

Charge II: Violation of Article 121a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921a. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.

1 United States v. Gaspar, NMCCA No. 202400033 Modified Entry of Judgment

Specification: Between on or about 20 July 2020 and on or about 8 December 2020, fraudulently use of a debit card to obtain property of an aggregate value of more than $1000. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.

SENTENCE

On 1 December 2023, a military judge sentenced the Accused to the following: Reduction to pay grade E-1. For the sole Specification of Charge I: confinement for two months. For the sole Specification of Charge II: confinement for two months. The terms of confinement will run concurrently. Confinement for a total of two months. A bad-conduct discharge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Crumpley
49 M.J. 538 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. GASPAR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gaspar-nmcca-2024.