United States v. GASPAR
This text of United States v. GASPAR (United States v. GASPAR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before KISOR, BROWN, and MIZER Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Sherwin C. GASPAR Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 202400033
Decided: 4 June 2024
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Eric A. Catto
Sentence adjudged 1 December 2023 by a special court-martial con- vened at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, consisting of a military judge sit- ting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, con- finement for two months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Major Timothy G. McCormick, USMCR United States v. Gaspar, NMCCA No. 202400033 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 However, we note the Entry of Judgment does not correctly identify Charge II to which Appellant pleaded guilty. 2 Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the content of his proceeding. 3 In accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1111(c)(2), we modify the Entry of Judgment and direct that it be included in the record. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
2 See Block 11 of the Entry of Judgment (incorrectly indicating that Charge II,
Violation of Article 121a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, corresponds to 10 U.S.C. § 921 rather than 10 U.S.C. § 921a). We appreciate Appellate Defense Counsel’s atten- tion to detail in identifying this matter. 3 United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).
2 This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 202400033
v. ENTRY OF Sherwin C. GASPAR JUDGMENT Sergeant (E-5) U.S. Marine Corps As Modified on Appeal Accused 4 June 2024
On 1 December 2023, the Accused was tried at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, by a special court-martial, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Military Judge Eric A. Catto presided.
FINDINGS
The following are the Accused’s pleas and the Court’s findings to all offenses the convening authority referred to trial:
Charge I: Violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 880. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification: On or about 29 March 2023, attempted fraudulent use of a credit card to obtain property of an aggregate value of more than $1000. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Charge II: Violation of Article 121a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921a. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
1 United States v. Gaspar, NMCCA No. 202400033 Modified Entry of Judgment
Specification: Between on or about 20 July 2020 and on or about 8 December 2020, fraudulently use of a debit card to obtain property of an aggregate value of more than $1000. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
SENTENCE
On 1 December 2023, a military judge sentenced the Accused to the following: Reduction to pay grade E-1. For the sole Specification of Charge I: confinement for two months. For the sole Specification of Charge II: confinement for two months. The terms of confinement will run concurrently. Confinement for a total of two months. A bad-conduct discharge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. GASPAR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gaspar-nmcca-2024.