United States v. Gaskins

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 20, 2009
Docket08-8162
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Gaskins (United States v. Gaskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gaskins, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8162

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARCUS LORENZO GASKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:03-cr-00015-F-l)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Lorenzo Gaskins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marcus Lorenzo Gaskins appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion seeking clarification of

restitution and fines imposed in his criminal judgment. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Gaskins, No. 7:03-cr-00015-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Gaskins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gaskins-ca4-2009.