United States v. Gaskins
This text of United States v. Gaskins (United States v. Gaskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8162
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARCUS LORENZO GASKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:03-cr-00015-F-l)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus Lorenzo Gaskins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marcus Lorenzo Gaskins appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion seeking clarification of
restitution and fines imposed in his criminal judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Gaskins, No. 7:03-cr-00015-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gaskins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gaskins-ca4-2009.