United States v. Garza-Garza

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garza-Garza. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 F. App'x 635
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2002·No. 01-20915·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20915 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROMUALDO GARZA-GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-914-1 -------------------- October 7, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Attorney Jonathan J. Paull, appointed to represent

Romualdo Garza-Garza (“Garza”), has requested leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Garza has not responded to the motion. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-20915 -2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garza-Garza, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Garza-Garza (United States v. Garza-Garza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)