United States v. Garza

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garza. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 F.4th 913
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2024·No. 24-40265·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-40265 Document: 37-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/20/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

____________ FILED November 20, 2024 No. 24-40265 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Daniel Garza,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:23-CR-1099-1 ______________________________

Before King, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Garza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-40265 Document: 37-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/20/2024

No. 24-40265

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garza, (5th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Garza (United States v. Garza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)