United States v. Garza

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garza. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 F.3d 1044
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 12, 1998·No. 96-50868·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50868 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESSE GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-95-CA-0562 - - - - - - - - - - February 27, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesse Garza, federal prisoner # 43437-080, has filed a

“renewed motion for reinstatement,” which this court construes as

a motion for reconsideration of this court's single-judge order

denying a certificate of appealability (COA). See Fed. R. App.

P. 27(c). Garza was not required to obtain a COA to appeal the

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Lindh v. Murphy, 117 S.

Ct. 2059, 2068 (1997). Therefore, his motion for reconsideration

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 96-50868 -2-

is GRANTED and the March 19, 1997, order denying COA is

RESCINDED.

For essentially the same reasons this court denied COA,

Garza's appeal of the denial of his § 2255 motion is DISMISSED

for lack of jurisdiction, and the appeal of the denial of Garza’s

post-judgment motion is AFFIRMED because Garza failed to raise an

argument specifically challenging that denial.

MOTION GRANTED. ORDER DENYING COA RESCINDED. DISMISSED IN

PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND AFFIRMED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garza, (5th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Garza (United States v. Garza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lindh v. Murphy
521 U.S. 320 (Supreme Court, 1997)