United States v. Gary Valentine
This text of 421 F. App'x 677 (United States v. Gary Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Gary Anthony Valentine appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Valentine contends that the district court erred in determining that the government’s substantial assistance motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) permitted it to consider only factors related to substantial assistance, and not the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), in determining the extent of the downward departure. This contention is foreclosed by United States *678 v. Jackson, 577 F.3d 1032, 1036 (9th Cir.2009).
Valentine also contends that his sentence was substantively unreasonable in light of the section 3553(a) factors. Because the district court could not reduce Valentine’s sentence on the basis of those factors, this contention fails. See id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
421 F. App'x 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gary-valentine-ca9-2011.