United States v. Gary Larock, Jr.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: July 22, 2019
• Docket: 18-11400
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 18-11400 Document: 00515043673 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 18-11400 FILED Summary Calendar July 22, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GARY E. LAROCK, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:13-CR-44-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gary E. Larock, Jr., pleaded true to violating the terms of his supervised release from his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, and the district court sentenced him to 24 months of imprisonment and a 180-month term of supervised release. On appeal, he argues that the district court plainly erred by imposing, without explanation, a standard condition of supervised release requiring that he “permit a probation officer to visit [him] at any time

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-11400 Document: 00515043673 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/22/2019

No. 18-11400

at home or elsewhere and permit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation officer.” As Larock concedes, our review is for plain error only. See United States v. Salazar, 743 F.3d 445, 448 (5th Cir. 2014). We recently rejected materially indistinguishable arguments on plain error review. See United States v. Cabello, 916 F.3d 543, 544 (5th Cir. 2019). Thus, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.