United States v. Gary Don Freeman
This text of United States v. Gary Don Freeman (United States v. Gary Don Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 97-1300 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Gary Don Freeman, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: August 18, 1997 Filed: August 22, 1997 ___________
Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Following multiple drug transactions with an undercover state police investigator, Gary Don Freeman pleaded guilty to eight counts of distributing cocaine base and one count of possessing cocaine base with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court1 sentenced him to 124 months imprisonment and 4 years supervised release. On appeal Freeman attacks his sentence and alleges that the government engaged in sentence manipulation because the undercover
1 The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. investigator, Willie Robinson, entered into repeated transactions with him and requested powder cocaine be made into crack cocaine. Robinson testified at the sentencing hearing that he made repeated purchases in an effort to reach Freeman's drug source, and except for his final purchase, he had always requested and received crack cocaine from Freeman. Robinson also testified that he succeeded in reaching Freeman's source, against whom cases were pending.
After reviewing the record, we find no merit in Freeman's challenge to his sentence. See United States v. Turner, 93 F.3d 1422, 1423 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); United States v. Shephard, 4 F.3d 647, 649 (8th Cir. 1993); United States v. Calva, 979 F.2d 119, 123 (8th Cir. 1992). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gary Don Freeman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gary-don-freeman-ca8-1997.