United States v. Gary Alfred Jack

451 F.2d 1272
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 3, 1972·No. 71-2217·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gary Alfred Jack failed to report for induction after being properly classified and receiving a valid induction order. He was convicted, and appeals.

We find that the local board’s decision not to reopen was made in accordance with the provisions of 32 C.F.R. 1625.2. Any prejudice Jack might have suffered in connection with a prior 1-A classification was cured by a subsequent reopening at his request and new classification of 1-A-O. Evans v. United States, 252 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1958). His order to report for induction followed his new classification, and was valid.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gary Alfred Jack, 451 F.2d 1272 (9th Cir. 1972).

451 F.2d 1272 (United States v. Gary Alfred Jack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. William Edward Hayes, Jr.
493 F.2d 1279 (First Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Rodwell
338 F. Supp. 780 (N.D. California, 1972)