United States v. Gary Alfred Jack
This text of 451 F.2d 1272 (United States v. Gary Alfred Jack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary Alfred Jack failed to report for induction after being properly classified and receiving a valid induction order. He was convicted, and appeals.
We find that the local board’s decision not to reopen was made in accordance with the provisions of 32 C.F.R. 1625.2. Any prejudice Jack might have suffered in connection with a prior 1-A classification was cured by a subsequent reopening at his request and new classification of 1-A-O. Evans v. United States, 252 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1958). His order to report for induction followed his new classification, and was valid.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
451 F.2d 1272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gary-alfred-jack-ca9-1972.