United States v. Gary A. Johnson, A/K/A Chub

46 F.3d 1128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7112, 1995 WL 47999
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 8, 1995
Docket94-5509
StatusUnpublished

This text of 46 F.3d 1128 (United States v. Gary A. Johnson, A/K/A Chub) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gary A. Johnson, A/K/A Chub, 46 F.3d 1128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7112, 1995 WL 47999 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

46 F.3d 1128

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gary A. JOHNSON, a/k/a Chub, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-5509.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 8, 1995.

Michael Morchower, MORCHOWER, LUXTON & WHALEY, Richmond, VA, for Appellant. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Stephen U. Baer, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, VA, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Gary A. Johnson pled guilty to one count of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, 21 U.S.C.A. Sec. 848 (West Supp.1994) (Count Two), and one count of money laundering, 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) (West Supp.1994) (Count Twenty-one). On the government's motion for a departure based on Johnson's substantial assistance,* the district court departed below the guideline range of 360 months to life, and imposed a sentence of 200 months. Johnson appeals his sentence, alleging that the court abused its discretion in refusing his request for a departure to 168 months. We dismiss the appeal.

A defendant may not contest on appeal the extent of a downward departure. See, e.g., United States v. Doe, 996 F.2d 606, 607 (2d Cir.1993) (listing cases); United States v. Hazel, 928 F.2d 420, 424 (D.C.Cir.1991). Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, Sec. 5K1.1, p.s. (Nov.1993)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robert D. Hazel
928 F.2d 420 (D.C. Circuit, 1991)
United States v. John Doe 1, and John Doe 2
996 F.2d 606 (Second Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 F.3d 1128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7112, 1995 WL 47999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gary-a-johnson-aka-chub-ca4-1995.