United States v. Garrate-Tirado
This text of 320 F. App'x 705 (United States v. Garrate-Tirado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Reyes Garrate-Tirado appeals from the 34-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for harboring illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iii) and (v)(iii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss based on the valid appeal waiver.
We review de novo Garrate-Tirado’s contention that the appeal waiver in his plea agreement does not preclude this ap[706]*706peal because it does not unambiguously prevent him from challenging the manner in which his sentence was imposed. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 624 (9th Cir.2007). We are unpersuaded, because the plea agreement unambiguously waives the right to any appeal permitted by 18 U.S.C. § 3742, which includes Gar-rate-Tirado’s claim that his sentence was imposed in violation of law. We therefore enforce the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d at 624.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garrate-tirado-ca9-2009.