United States v. Garner

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 1998·No. 98-7114·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7114

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NORMAN LANCE GARNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-485, CA-98-1579-7-20)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Alfred M. Boggs, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellant. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Norman Lance Garner seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Garner, Nos. CR-97-485; CA-

98-1579-7-20 (D.S.C. June 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garner, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Garner (United States v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related