United States v. Garner
71 M.J. 301, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 422
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided April 18, 2012·No. No. 12-0282/AR·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
CCA 20080401. Review granted on the following issues:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN SHE FAILED TO GIVE THE NECESSARY INSTRUCTIONS ON SENTENCE RECONSIDERATION.
WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE II STATES AN OFFENSE EVEN THOUGH THE GOVERNMENT DID NOT ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT, EITHER EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue I only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Garner, 71 M.J. 301, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 422 (Ark. 2012).
71 M.J. 301 (United States v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Garner
71 M.J. 430 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)