United States v. Garland Edmund Nease
Opinion
Appellant appeals after conviction in a jury trial on a bank robbery charge before the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict of guilty and that the District Judge improperly allowed impeaching evidence and evidence of his participation in an earlier jail break into the record.
On a review of the entire record of this trial, we conclude that the evidence was more than sufficient to support the jury verdict of guilty and that no reversible error was committed by the trial judge.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
458 F.2d 1361 (United States v. Garland Edmund Nease) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.