United States v. Garland Edmund Nease
This text of 458 F.2d 1361 (United States v. Garland Edmund Nease) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals after conviction in a jury trial on a bank robbery charge before the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict of guilty and that the District Judge improperly allowed impeaching evidence and evidence of his participation in an earlier jail break into the record.
On a review of the entire record of this trial, we conclude that the evidence was more than sufficient to support the jury verdict of guilty and that no reversible error was committed by the trial judge.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 F.2d 1361, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garland-edmund-nease-ca6-1972.