United States v. Garland Alfonzo Hardy

252 F.2d 780
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1958
Docket24792_1
StatusPublished

This text of 252 F.2d 780 (United States v. Garland Alfonzo Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Garland Alfonzo Hardy, 252 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1958).

Opinion

252 F.2d 780

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Garland Alfonzo HARDY, Appellant.

No. 169.

Docket 24792.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued January 9, 1958.

Decided January 31, 1958.

Writ of Certiorari Denied April 28, 1958.

See 78 S.Ct. 791.

John T. Moran, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. S. D. N. Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Garland Alfonzo Hardy, pro se.

Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion of Judge Cashin, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 208. As to appellant's claim of ineffective legal representation before sentence in that his counsel refused to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we also point out that a direct appeal does not lie from the denial of such a motion made after indictment. Cogen v. United States, 278 U.S. 221, 49 S.Ct. 118, 73 L. Ed. 275; Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394, 404, 77 S.Ct. 1332, 1 L.Ed.2d 1442.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cogen v. United States
278 U.S. 221 (Supreme Court, 1929)
Carroll v. United States
354 U.S. 394 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Hardy v. United States
159 F. Supp. 208 (S.D. New York, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 F.2d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garland-alfonzo-hardy-ca2-1958.