United States v. Gardner
This text of 121 F. App'x 285 (United States v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Marlon Gardner appeals his 37-month sentence following his guilty plea to conspiracy to commit bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we af[286]*286firm in part and vacate and remand for resentencing.
Gardner contends that the requirement under the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135, that individuals on supervised release provide a DNA sample is unconstitutional. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Kincade, 379 F.3d 813, 832-34 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc).
We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-,-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 769, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and United States v. Ameline, 400 F.3d 646, No. 02-30326, 2005 WL 350811 (9th Cir. Feb. 10, 2005).
AFFIRMED in part; VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 F. App'x 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gardner-ca9-2005.