United States v. Garcia-Perez
This text of 298 F. App'x 630 (United States v. Garcia-Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Juan Garcia-Perez appeals from the 41-[631]*631month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gareia-Perez contends that his sentence is unreasonable because it overstates his conduct of conviction and double counts his criminal history. We conclude that Garcia-Perez’s sentence is not procedurally or substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993-94 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom. Zavala v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 2491, 171 L.Ed.2d 780 (2008); United States v. Lunar-Herrera, 149 F.3d 1054, 1055-56 (9th Cir.1998).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
298 F. App'x 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garcia-perez-ca9-2008.