United States v. Garcia-Espinoza
This text of 325 F. App'x 380 (United States v. Garcia-Espinoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Roberto Garcia-Espinoza appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea [381]*381conviction of illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Espinoza asserts that the district court erred when it ordered his federal sentence to run consecutively to a not-yet-imposed state sentence. Because his challenge is foreclosed by our prior precedent, we affirm the district court’s holding.1
* ifs *
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be [381]*381published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 F. App'x 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garcia-espinoza-ca5-2009.