United States v. Garcia

137 F. App'x 979
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 F. App'x 378
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2005·No. Nos. 03-10067, 03-10071; D.C. No. CR-00-00105-MJJ·Published

Opinion

ORDER

We remand the sentences imposed in these cases to the district court, without vacating the sentences, to follow the procedure established in the en banc decision of United States v. Ameline1 and to consider whether the sentences would have been materially different in light of United States v. Booker,2

Defendants’ motion to file a second petition for rehearing is GRANTED, and the second petition for rehearing, and the request for stay of mandate is DENIED as moot.

Defendants’ sentences are REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garcia, 137 F. App'x 979 (9th Cir. 2005).

137 F. App'x 979 (United States v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)