United States v. Garcia

133 F. App'x 430
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 F. App'x 378
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2005·No. No. 04-50105·Published

Opinion

ORDER

We resubmit Garcia’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his sentence. Because Garcia did not challenge his sentence on Sixth Amendment grounds in the district court, we review his sentence for plain error. Pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1074-75, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), we remand Garcia’s sentence to the district court for the district court to determine whether it would have sentenced Garcia differently under an advisory Guidelines system. If so, the district court shall vacate Garcia’s sentence and re-sentence him under the post-Booker advisory Guidelines. If not, Garcia’s sentence shall remain undisturbed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garcia, 133 F. App'x 430 (9th Cir. 2005).

133 F. App'x 430 (United States v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)