United States v. Garcia

8 F. App'x 706
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 F. App'x 641
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 19, 2001·No. No. 00-30338; D.C. No. CR 00-00333-P·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Jorge Garcia appeals the 33-month and 25-day sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Garcia contends that using a prior conviction not specifically alleged in the indictment to impose a sentence in excess of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)’s two-year statutory maximum is unlawful under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This argument is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garcia, 8 F. App'x 706 (9th Cir. 2001).

8 F. App'x 706 (United States v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)