United States v. Garcia

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 F.3d 1009
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1996·No. 95-40511·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40511 Conference Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE GARCIA, also known as Poncho,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CR-25-1 - - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Garcia appeals his sentence for money laundering and

aiding and abetting money laundering because the district court

refused to grant him an additional one-level decrease for

acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b)(2).

We have reviewed the record and the decision of the district

court and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

sentence for the reasons stated by the district court at

sentencing.

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garcia, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Garcia (United States v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.