United States v. Garcia

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 17, 1998·No. 98-6313·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6313

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GUALBERTO GARCIA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-90-115, CA-97-311-R)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gualberto Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Garcia, Nos. CR-90-115; CA-

97-311-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garcia, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Garcia (United States v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related