United States v. Garcia

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Garcia

679 F. App'x 983

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 6, 2017·No. No. 16-11357 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Hardy, appointed counsel for Tay-ron Rojas Garcia, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rojas Gar[984] cia’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David Hardy, appointed counsel for Tay-ron Rojas Garcia, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rojas Gar[984] cia’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Garcia, 679 F. App'x 983 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

679 F. App'x 983 (United States v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related