United States v. Garcia

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 433 F. App'x 741
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 28, 2011·No. 10-15869·Unpublished

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 28, 2011 No. 10-15869 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cr-80085-KAM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SALVADOR GONZALEZ GARCIA, a.k.a. Santos G. Lizarraga, a.k.a. Roberto Salazar Gonzalez, a.k.a. Romero Rodriguez, a.k.a. Santiago Ayala, a.k.a. Roberto R,

Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________

(July 28, 2011)

Before CARNES, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Bruce E. Reinhart, appointed appellate counsel for Salvador Gonzalez

Garcia, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1936, 18 L.Ed.2d 493

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garcia’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garcia, (11th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Garcia (United States v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)