United States v. Garcia-Alcantar
This text of 333 F. App'x 277 (United States v. Garcia-Alcantar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Adrian Garcia-Aleantar appeals from the $1,000 fine imposed as part of his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for bringing in illegal aliens without [278]*278presentation, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Garcia-Alcantar contends that the district court erred by imposing the $1,000 fine because he has neither the present nor future ability to pay the fine. The district court did not clearly err in its factual determination that Garcia-Alcantar is able to pay the fine. See United States v. Orlando, 553 F.3d 1235, 1239-40 (9th Cir.2009). Moreover, the district court sufficiently considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a) and 3572(a), adequately explained its decision to impose the fíne, and imposed a reasonable fine. See id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid[278]*278ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 F. App'x 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garcia-alcantar-ca9-2009.