United States v. Garces

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Garces

140 F. App'x 916

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 28, 2005·No. No. 04-15112; D.C. Docket No. 04-00077-CR-T-26-MSS·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Scott M. McCluskey, counsel for Juan Pablo Ferrin Garces, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the [917]*917appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garces’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Scott M. McCluskey, counsel for Juan Pablo Ferrin Garces, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the [917]*917appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garces’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Garces, 140 F. App'x 916 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

140 F. App'x 916 (United States v. Garces) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related