United States v. Garay
Opinion
Jessica Garay appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty plea to trans *819 portation of undocumented aliens. She argues that her sentence is unreasonable as a matter of law because our post-Booker 1 rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory sentencing guidelines regime. Garay correctly concedes that this claim is foreclosed by our precedent and raises it only to preserve its further review by the Supreme Court. See Rita v. United States, — U.S. -,---, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462-66, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
257 F. App'x 818 (United States v. Garay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.