United States v. Gannon
This text of 194 F. App'x 693 (United States v. Gannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Charles Gannon in these appeals from the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of these appeals [694]*694is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term and the resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 F. App'x 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gannon-ca11-2006.