United States v. Gannon

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Gannon

194 F. App'x 693

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 25, 2006·No. Nos. 06-11201, 06-11455·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Charles Gannon in these appeals from the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of these appeals [694] is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term and the resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Charles Gannon in these appeals from the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of these appeals [694] is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term and the resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gannon, 194 F. App'x 693 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

194 F. App'x 693 (United States v. Gannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related