United States v. Gamez-Silva

289 F. App'x 827
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 20, 2008
Docket08-40042
StatusUnpublished

This text of 289 F. App'x 827 (United States v. Gamez-Silva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gamez-Silva, 289 F. App'x 827 (5th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Rolando Gamez-Silva appeals from his sentence for being an alien unlawfully found in the United States after deportation following a felony conviction. He asserts that the district court erred by imposing a 16-level enhancement based upon his prior Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation. Although he recognizes our precedent that this offense is a crime of violence for U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 purposes, he argues that James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 1599-1600, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007), overrules it. His argument is unpersuasive. In United States v. Gomez-Guerra, 485 F.3d 301, 303 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 156, 169 L.Ed.2d 106 (2007), we noted that James pertains only to a residual provision of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) that is absent from § 2L1.2. Consequently, James is not dispositive. Because we have held that the Texas offense of burglary of a habitation constitutes a crime of violence for purposes of § 2L1.2, the district court did not err in applying the enhancement. See Gomez-Guerra, 485 F.3d at 304 & n. 3; United States v. Garcia-Mendez, 420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir.2005).

The Government’s motions for summary affirmance and to waive the requirement to file an appellee’s brief are GRANTED, the Government’s motion for an extension of time to file an appellee’s brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Garcia-Mendez
420 F.3d 454 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Gomez-Guerra
485 F.3d 301 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
James v. United States
550 U.S. 192 (Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 F. App'x 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gamez-silva-ca5-2008.