United States v. Gamboa-Cano

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Gamboa-Cano

510 F.2d 598

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 1975

DocketNo. 74-2652

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 510 F.2d 598 (United States v. Gamboa-Cano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Gamboa-Cano, 510 F.2d 598 (5th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have considered the several assignments of error by appellant in this case relating to the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the jury’s verdict of guilty, to the asserted involuntariness of the defendant’s confession, to the conduct of the judge during the trial as having been prejudicial to the defendant, and to the alleged failure of the trial judge to comply with the principle of Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d 855 (1974), relative to the necessity of an explicit finding that defendant would not benefit from sentencing under the Youth Corrections Act.

After a careful review of the record, we find the assignments of error to be without merit. We also hold that since the defendant herein is over the age of 22, a young adult offender, the sentencing judge was not required to make explicit findings that the defendant would not benefit from the Youth Corrections Act (18 U.S.C. § 4209).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have considered the several assignments of error by appellant in this case relating to the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the jury’s verdict of guilty, to the asserted involuntariness of the defendant’s confession, to the conduct of the judge during the trial as having been prejudicial to the defendant, and to the alleged failure of the trial judge to comply with the principle of Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d 855 (1974), relative to the necessity of an explicit finding that defendant would not benefit from sentencing under the Youth Corrections Act.

After a careful review of the record, we find the assignments of error to be without merit. We also hold that since the defendant herein is over the age of 22, a young adult offender, the sentencing judge was not required to make explicit findings that the defendant would not benefit from the Youth Corrections Act (18 U.S.C. § 4209).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 F.2d 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gamboa-cano-ca5-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack