United States v. Galvan-Lozano
This text of 101 F. App'x 257 (United States v. Galvan-Lozano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Galvan-Lozano appeals the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Galvan-Lozano contends that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court denied Galvan-Lozano due process by imposing a sentence longer than 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)’s two-year statutory maximum based on a prior conviction that was neither charged in the indictment nor admitted as part of the guilty plea. This contention, as Galvan-Lozano concedes,1 is foreclosed. United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 413-15 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 F. App'x 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-galvan-lozano-ca9-2004.