United States v. Gallman
This text of United States v. Gallman (United States v. Gallman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8539
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL GALLMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (8:00-cr-00191-HMH-2)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Gallman, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Gallman appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing to establish his
substantial assistance to the Government. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Gallman, No. 8:00-cr-00191-HMH-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 18, 2008). We
also deny Gallman’s motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gallman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gallman-ca4-2009.