United States v. Gallman

325 F. App'x 291
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2009·No. No. 08-8539·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Gallman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing to establish his substantial assistance to the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gallman, No. 8:00-cr-00191-HMH-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 18, 2008). We also deny Gallman’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gallman, 325 F. App'x 291 (4th Cir. 2009).

325 F. App'x 291 (United States v. Gallman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.