United States v. Gallien

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 2004
Docket03-30511
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Gallien (United States v. Gallien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gallien, (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D February 3, 2004 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30509 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE CELESTINE; TELLY GALLIEN, Defendants-Appellants.

(Consolidated with)

No. 03-30511 Summary Calendar

TRAVIS GALLIEN; SIDNEY GALLIEN, Defendants-Appellants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:01-CR-60127-1

Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*

In this consolidated appeal, George Celestine, Telly Gallien, Travis Gallien, and Sidney

Gallien appeal the denial o f a motion to dismiss the indictment based on double jeopardy grounds

following a mistrial. The defendants argue that the Government intentionally engaged in prejudicial

conduct, thereby forcing the defendants to move for a mistrial.

The district court granted the mistrial based on the prejudicial effect of four errors

which occurred during the trial. The district court’s finding that the Government did not intentionally

goad the defendants into moving for a mistrial was not clearly erroneous. See United States v.

Gonzalez, 76 F.3d 1339, 1342 (5th Cir. 1996); Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 676 (1982).

Accordingly, the district court’s denial of the motion to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy

grounds is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gonzalez
76 F.3d 1339 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Oregon v. Kennedy
456 U.S. 667 (Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Gallien, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gallien-ca5-2004.