United States v. Gallego

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Gallego

329 F. App'x 115

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 16, 2009·No. No. 08-10487·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Because 18 U.S.C. § 4082(a) defines a type of “escape” under 18 U.S.C. § 751, the district court’s jury instruction was not improper and did not improperly amend the indictment. See United States v. Jones, 569 F.2d 499, 501 (9th Cir.1978) [116] (using § 4082 as an example of “escape” under 18 U.S.C. § 751).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM **

Because 18 U.S.C. § 4082(a) defines a type of “escape” under 18 U.S.C. § 751, the district court’s jury instruction was not improper and did not improperly amend the indictment. See United States v. Jones, 569 F.2d 499, 501 (9th Cir.1978) [116] (using § 4082 as an example of “escape” under 18 U.S.C. § 751).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

United States v. Gallego, 329 F. App'x 115 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

329 F. App'x 115 (United States v. Gallego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related