United States v. Gallego
This text of 329 F. App'x 115 (United States v. Gallego) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Because 18 U.S.C. § 4082(a) defines a type of “escape” under 18 U.S.C. § 751, the district court’s jury instruction was not improper and did not improperly amend the indictment. See United States v. Jones, 569 F.2d 499, 501 (9th Cir.1978) [116]*116(using § 4082 as an example of “escape” under 18 U.S.C. § 751).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 F. App'x 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gallego-ca9-2009.